Savings accounts leave you worse off
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Bates warned that basic-rate taxpayers with savings in accounts paying less than 2.75 per cent a year will lose money in real terms over the next 12 months. Higher-rate taxpayers need to earn at least 3.67 per cent on their savings in order to beat the effect of tax and inflation.
Even some non-taxpayers are losing out, because one in seven accounts pays less than 2.4 per cent a year, the rate needed to keep pace with inflation.
Paul Illott, a senior investment adviser at Bates, warned that savers had been hit hard by last month's reduction in the Bank of England's base rate. Savings rates have fallen in line with the cut, even though tax rates and inflation remained constant.
"Many savings accounts offer capital security in nominal terms only," Illott warned. "When the effects of tax and inflation are taken into account, most savers are still seeing the purchasing power of their capital being eroded."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments