Questions Of Cash: 'I'm upset over treatment at French Connection'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Q.We corresponded in 2008 regarding excessive bank charges, which you featured under the heading "I was broke but my bank still charged me". Guess what, I'm broke again! I have lost income during the recession, this has led to me being ill and I owe university fees. When you took up my complaint, the legal action on excessive fees had just begun. I was suffering financial hardship at the time of the charges, but this had eased by the time I made my claim, so the bank rejected my claim for a refund. Following the Supreme Court decision finding in favour of the banks, are there grounds for a refund of charges if a person again suffers financial hardship? RH, Hove.
A. Your bank, the RBS, explains: "If a customer's circumstances change, or if they have additional information to support their financial hardship claim, then they should contact the bank for their situation to be reviewed." When we again contacted RBS on your behalf, it referred your claim to the Office of Fair Trading Hardship Team. With help from Citizens Advice, you drew up an income and expenditure statement to demonstrate the extent of your hardship. The claim was then accepted. As a result, RBS has now agreed to repay you £718 in charges, which covers about six years'.
Q. I am very upset with a transaction involving French Connection. I bought a dress for £35 from its outlet in Watford in February. When I got home I realised it was a size too big. So, 48 hours later, I returned to the store to exchange the dress for the correct size. I was charged an extra £29 as the dress had gone up in price, despite the fact I had the receipt to prove I'd paid about half that cost two days earlier. This is so unfair! They don't offer refunds, so I was offered a credit note. Can they do this? AH, London.
A. As you made the error, there does not appear to be any obligation on French Connection to replace the goods for the price you paid. However, French Connection has agreed to repay you the extra £29 you paid and is also giving you an additional £30 voucher as an apology for not treating you in line with its own policies. The company says: "French Connection Watford were of course wrong in asking you to pay more for the exchange than you had originally purchased the item for and we have notified the area manager responsible for the store, who will be re-training the staff in both company procedures and customer services."
Q. In November 2008 Shell Gas changed its bank details for residential customers. I changed their ABN Amro account details with my own bank, IF, shortly afterwards and made several successful payments. However, I didn't realise that I had the last two digits of their account number the wrong way round. In November 2009 I made my usual payment and got a reminder from Shell a month later to say it was still waiting for payment. I only then discovered my error. The amount involved is over £470 and all my bank will do is to ask ABN Amro to request its customer to make a repayment, which they have not done. AC, Kinross.
A. We began our enquiries by contact IF, which is part of the Lloyds Banking Group. Its spokesman confirmed your explanation of what had happened. "The standing order was set-up incorrectly by the customer. We are making payments as he has directed to us via the SO he set-up." It assumes that someone at the destination bank was manually correcting the error, but this ceased to happen in November last year – presumably when a staff member left or changed jobs. "The money may be in a wrong account, or it may be in a suspense account awaiting correction," added the spokesman. "In any event – it has left us and is with ABN. The customer has advised my colleague that ABN won't speak to him to help. But they must speak to him."
We then contacted ABN Amro, which carried out an investigation and then advised us that the Shell account was one of those affected by the acquisition by RBS of much of the ABN business. At that point we took up the matter with RBS, by which time several weeks had passed. RBS located the funds the day after we reported the matter to them – but, by an amazing coincidence, apparently independently of us raising it with them. It has now transferred the payment to the correct Shell account.
Questions of Cash cannot give individual advice. But if you have a financial dilemma, we'll do our best to help. Please email us at: questionsofcash@independent.co.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments