Peer's fury as legal aid cuts affect 500,000

 

Simon Read
Friday 29 March 2013 20:00 GMT
Comments
Legal aid will no longer be provided in family law cases
Legal aid will no longer be provided in family law cases (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government's legal aid reforms coming into effect on Monday have been branded a "day of shame for our legal system" by the former minister and Labour peer Lord Bach.

He posted a Regret Motion in the House of Lords this week that won by 166 votes to 161. Regret motions do not have any binding power but indicate peers' disapproval of ministers' actions.

The legal aid reforms will leave an estimated 500,000 people with no access to legal help from Monday. Of these, around 200,000 will miss out because legal aid will not be provided for family law cases which involve separation and divorce, child custody or financial issues arising from changing circumstances.

"Without wishing to frighten people, I think the impact of these cuts is going to be horrendous," warned Joanna Kemp, of the law firm Barlow Robbins. "People who can't afford solicitors are among the most vulnerable in our society and these changes are going to mean that they are effectively excluded from justice.

"Moreover, other users of the court system for whatever reason are going to see a considerable increase in delay, which is only going to be harmful to society in the long run."

Katy Gittins, of Absolute Barrister, agreed. "These changes risk significant numbers of people being excluded from access to legal services," she warned. Her firm puts people in direct contact with barristers, cutting back on solicitors' fees.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in