The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Mark Dampier: Perhaps things aren't quite as bad as the media suggests
The Analyst
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Back in 2009 I coined a phrase on the radio: "The long middle". It referred to my view that the UK economy would not bounce back strongly from recession. I thought it would take many years for any meaningful recovery to come.
Four years on and it is clear to me the picture has changed very little.
At a recent seminar with Richard Jeffrey, Cazenove's chief investment officer, I found that he shares my views. Mr Jeffrey's forecast is for sub-trend growth to continue in the UK, US and Europe for a number of years. In the UK this means annual GDP growth of around 1.5 per cent, in the US 2.5 per cent, and for Europe, excluding the southern Mediterranean countries, around 1.5 per cent as well. The problem is that we have grown used to an economy growing at 3 per cent a year – an economy growing at less than half of this feels weak.
Mr Jeffrey raises the valid point that the media could actually be making things worse. The Opposition has naturally seized upon the concept of a "double-dip" recession, though I think it is probably more a case of growth stagnating, meandering between positive and negative periods influenced by temporary factors such as the Olympics.
Like me, Mr Jeffrey is somewhat sceptical of the Office for National Statistics' first estimates of UK GDP data. He explains that going back 20 years, the average revision to the first-quarterly estimate of year-on-year growth has been over 0.7 per cent. Furthermore, out of 82 first-quarterly estimates going back to 1992 some 34 revisions have been 1 per cent or higher. On only 16 occasions out of 82 was the first estimate revised downwards.
Bearing in mind that the media makes a big deal of this first estimate, we would probably be better to delay publication and await the second estimate, which becomes considerably more accurate.
This is important because business and consumer behaviour could be led by this first estimate.
Anything which puts consumers off spending, or stops businesses investing, is hardly great for the economy if it paints a false picture.
It is entirely possible, therefore, that we have not had a double dip at all. As many people have pointed out, jobs data has been very strong, and this is at odds with the GDP readings.
The UK private sector created 600,000 jobs in the year to June; not indicative of a setback in the economy. I'm not suggesting that we are off to the races just yet, but things could be better than the media presently portray.
So how do we interpret all this? To me, it suggests shorter, more fragile business and economic cycles for the UK, highly changeable conditions, and a tightrope walk between growth and recession. If economic growth is only at 1 per cent to 1.5 per cent, a sudden shock could easily plunge us into recession.
In terms of consequences for markets, Mr Jeffrey's view is that eventually the euro will fail. This is partly political, because the southern Mediterranean countries need to continually cut the cost of labour, which induces a deflationary spiral, as we are already seeing in Greece.
The pinch point, though, is not Greece but France, whose banking system has the largest exposure to southern Mediterranean countries. At some point we will see whether Germany really will stand behind the entire eurozone.
For stock markets, perhaps counter-intuitively, this would appear to leave the FTSE on a reasonable valuation, with possibly more upside for cyclical stocks as Mr Jeffrey believes GDP will be around 1.5 per cent for the UK next year. The US looks the most expensive market, with the cheapest stocks in Europe and, as usual, Japan. Finally, in emerging markets, the major economies of China, India, Brazil and Russia have had a tough time, but market valuations are starting to look attractive vs historic trends.
In summary, while the economic outlook is poor, it is perhaps not as bad as much of the media and the opposition would have you believe. With central banks maintaining very loose monetary policy, equities could just surprise on the upside – despite the gloom.
Mark Dampier is head of research at Hargreaves Lansdown, the asset manager, financial advisor and stockbroker. For more details about the funds included in this column, visit www.hl.co.uk/independent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments