Isa limits spared in bid to encourage saving
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Investors are set to save more than £7bn in tax over the next five years after the Chancellor finally backed down on proposals to cut the annual limits on Individual Savings Accounts (Isas) this week.
Investors are set to save more than £7bn in tax over the next five years after the Chancellor finally backed down on proposals to cut the annual limits on Individual Savings Accounts (Isas) this week.
Since Isas were first introduced in 1999, investors have been able to invest £7,000 a year tax-free in a stocks and shares Isa, or up to £3,000 tax-free in a cash Isa.
However, the limits were set to be reduced to £5,000 and £1,000 respectively, at the end of the current tax year in April. Although the tax-efficiency of the stocks and shares Isa was significantly reduced earlier this year, when the Chancellor elected to scrap the tax-credit on dividends, cash Isas have become increasingly popular.
According to the Inland Revenue, the amount of money going into cash Isas has risen from £11.6bn in 1999/2000 to more than £19bn in the last tax year. The average amount invested is almost £1,700. If Mr Brown's original proposals to cut the limits had gone ahead, the amount invested in Isas was expected to have more than halved, while the amount of tax paid by savers would have increased by more than £1bn a year.
Tony Vine-Lott, the director general of the Pep & Isa Managers Association, who has campaigned for extension of the Isa limits for the past five years, said he was pleasantly surprised by the news.
"When we raised questions about Isa limits in the summer, Ruth Kelly [then the financial secretary to the Treasury] said only that no decision had been made," he said. "So I was delighted to hear an announcement in the pre-budget report. It would have been nice if they had agreed to index-link the limit though, so that it increased every year."
Paul Knox, a tax director with Ernst & Young, said he believes the the move will prevent a further deterioration in the amount people save in the UK. "It will certainly encourage people to continue saving, when otherwise they may have not," he said.
But Paul Falvey, a tax partner with Grant Thornton, said the Government needs to go much further if it is going to address the problem of people's apathetic attitude towards saving in the UK.
"We don't save enough in this country, and Gordon Brown has done very little to encourage it," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments