Investment Insider: Is it clever to play follow the leader?

Sometimes a business, and not its boss, is where the value lies

David Kuo
Saturday 14 December 2013 19:30 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Dame Marjorie Scardino transformed Pearson from a sprawling business that had its finger in an unconnected selection of pies.

It was involved in investment banking, tourism, television and printing. But during her reign, Dame Marjorie shifted the company's focus to publication and education through brands that include the Financial Times, The Economist and Penguin books.

In the 15 years that Dame Marjorie was in charge, sales had tripled to nearly £6bn and profits had grown more than threefold.

Over that period, shareholders were rewarded with a total return of more than 200 per cent. In other words, it delivered an average return of around 7 per cent a year over a decade and a half. Since her departure, the shares have continued to deliver similar returns – almost as though nothing has changed. Yet Dame Marjorie and her like are lauded, and their departure can cause a nervous intake of breath from investors.

Apple is an interesting business, whose flagging fortunes were spectacularly revived when co-founder Steve Jobs returned to the company after a 12-year absence. During his 14-year stint, he turned a company that had been on the brink of bankruptcy to one of the most successful high-technology businesses in the world.

Shareholders enjoyed an annualised return of 34 per cent on their investment. Since Mr Jobs's untimely death the returns, while still impressive, have fallen back to around 21 per cent.

Apple recently poached the boss of Burberry, Angela Ahrendts, to head its retail operation from the middle of next year. Ms Ahrendts is credited with building Burberry's image into a global brand.

During her time at Burberry, shareholders have enjoyed a return of around 20 per cent a year for seven year. She will be succeeded by Christopher Bailey, who is reckoned to be as creative as Ms Ahrendts was astute.

Another head honcho on the move is Lance Batchelor, who will be swapping pizzas for pensions. News of his departure from Dominos to join Saga sent shares in the pizza-delivery outfit down by as much as 10 per cent.

It is not just the departure of company bosses that can effect a business. The recent announcement that fund manager Neil Woodford would be leaving Invesco Perpetual prompted some investors to withdraw their money. It is reckoned that assets under management have shrunk by about 4 per cent.

It is unclear whether the departure of key personnel can hit performance. Warren Buffett once quipped that we should buy shares in businesses that are so wonderful an idiot can run them, because sooner or later, one will.

David Kuo is director of fool.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in