Five Questions On: Crowdfunding

 

Simon Read
Friday 06 February 2015 22:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This is the so-called democratisation of finance, isn't it?

That's what its fans would have you believe. They say crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending cut out the banks – and reduce their big profits – by putting investors directly in touch with people who need money, whether that's businesses needing start-up capital or growth finance, or individuals needing loans. And it's proving popular. For instance this week the Burgundy winemaker Domaine Chanzy decided to use the crowdfunding platform Seedrs to raise funds for its initial public offering on AIM.

But not everyone agrees that it's the road to fairer finance?

Critics warn that it's a charter for assorted unscrupulous rogues and villains to profit from unwary folk.

That sounds harsh. Who says that?

Warnings have come from many quarters in the few short years since crowdfunding exploded on the scene, but this week it was the turn of the Financial Conduct Authority to publish some concerns about some of the misleading practices resorted to by crowdfunding firms.

What sort of things?

The regulator said its review of 25 investment-based crowdfunding platforms revealed that most of them were leaving out or "cherry-picking" information, leading to "a potentially misleading or unrealistically optimistic impression of the investment". Where risk warnings were included they were diminished "by claims that no capital had been lost".

What is the FCA doing?

Christopher Woolard, the director of strategy and competition at the regulator, said: "Our aim is to ensure that the growth we're seeing comes with appropriate investor protection in place." It has already forced firms to change websites but says it will continue to monitor them and conduct a full review in 2016 of the crowdfunding rules it launched last April.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in