Fewer buyers than expected helped by stamp duty holiday

Sunday 22 November 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government's stamp-duty holiday on properties sold for less than £175,000 has not helped nearly as many homeowners as first predicted.

Figures obtained by property website zoopla.co.uk show that in the first 12 months of the holiday, until 1 September, buyers saved just £173m compared with the £600m predicted by the Government.

A combination of factors lies behind the disparity. First-time buyers – the most likely to benefit from the holiday – have found it hard to get mortgages due to tight lending criteria.

Transaction levels have also been lower than normal across the whole market with a shortage of properties to buy.

What's more, prices have risen in recent months, taking more transactions above the £175,000 threshold.

The stamp-duty holiday ends in January, but despite its limited success, Nicholas Leeming from zoopla.co.uk is one of many property professionals calling for it to be extended and made more generous.

"The stamp-duty holiday has so far failed to reinvigorate the housing market," he says. "Rather than ending it, the Government should consider extending it by making first-time buyers permanently exempt and by giving others the ability to defer payment for up to, say, five years."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in