Energy suppliers worst for billing mistakes

Sunday 18 April 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Consumers have named energy suppliers as the worst culprits for getting bills wrong for the fourth year in a row, according to new research from uSwitch. com, a price comparison site.

The energy industry was voted worst for inaccuracy, ahead of banks, council tax departments and other utility providers, pipping HM Revenue & Customs to the post.

Three in 10 households have been on the receiving end of an inaccurate energy bill within the past two years - 17 per cent of these on more than one occasion. On average, these inaccuracies took just over two months to resolve, although 36 per cent were resolved within a week. In addition, 12 per cent of households have ended up owing between £200 and £400 due to a discrepancy between an estimated and an actual bill.

According to Ann Robinson, the director of consumer policy at uSwitch, consumers have to take matters into their own hands: "Suppliers have been working hard to make it easier than ever for consumers to provide their own readings – online, by phone, post or even text. Consumers should aim to provide a reading once a quarter. Failure to do so can result in an estimated bill – where many of the issues relating to accuracy lie."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in