Credit card rates 'mislead'

Personal Finance Editor,David Prosser
Saturday 04 February 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Credit card lenders are routinely misleading borrowers because the interest rates they charge are impossible to compare, the consumer group Which? warned yesterday. It said credit card charges were so complicated that a card with a lower interest rate could actually be more expensive than plastic charging a higher rate.

For example, borrowing £2,800 over a year on a credit card from internet bank Cahoot would cost £40 at an interest rate of 11.8 per cent. Yet the same debt on HSBC's standard credit card, with a rate of 13.9 per cent, would cost only £38 to service.

Which? warned the credit card industry calculated interest charges in 14 different ways. Some lenders begin charging interest as soon as you buy an item, while others wait until the money has gone out of their accounts. Some charge interest on interest accrued in previous months, while many lenders do not.

Which? said its investigations showed HSBC, Liverpool Victoria and Saga operated the fairest interest charging policies, while it criticised American Express, Cahoot, Halifax, MBNA, Mint, NatWest, Sainsbury's and Tesco.

A spokeswoman for Apacs, which represents the credit card industry, said lenders accepted that charges weren't always clear. "But I don't expect to see standardised interest rate calculations because that would require lenders to standardise products."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in