BRIEFS : Lessons for the Law Society
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.All professional bodies face conflicting pressures to regulate and represent their members, according to research by the Law Society. The study - which also looked at other fields, including accountancy, general medical practice, architecture, de ntistry, social work and psychology - was carried out in order to inform the society about developments in other professions and to help it learn from the way other professional bodies carry out their functions.
The research found that professions are dealing with demands from the public for higher standards of service. These usually lead to further regulations, and the risk of alienating the membership. Outside regulation is increasingly limiting professional
bodies' freedom of action.
The most underdeveloped area in many professions is services to clients; little contact exists between professional bodies and potential clients of their members. A greater number of complaints are heard, especially of poor service. But most bodies have inadequate mechanisms for feeding the lessons from complaints back into the regulatory process, although there is a trend for compulsory post-qualification training.
Multidisciplinary co-operation is becoming more common; only solicitors and barristers are now unable to form UK-based multidisciplinary partnerships.
The study was conducted by Janet Allaker and Professor Joanna Shapland of the Institute for the Study of the Legal Profession at the University of Sheffield.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments