£31,500 fine for adviser

Sunday 23 March 2008 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Blake Independent Financial Services (BIFS) has been fined £31,500 for misleading City watchdog the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

The problem arose when the independent advice firm claimed to have financial backing in place, which it did not. Under FSA rules, BIFS needed "subordinated loans" in place so it could pay its creditors in case the firm went into receivership. BIFS claimed that it had these loans, when in fact it didn't.

"These were serious failings on the part of the firm," said Jonathan Phelan, head of retail enforcement at the FSA

"The fine sends out a clear warning to the industry that the way in which firms conduct their business and the way they interact with the FSA are as important as ensuring that individual rules are not breached," he added.

The Barnsley-based BIFS has since made sure there are enough subordinated loans in place and the company's head of compliance, and the accountancy firm from which it took advice, have been replaced.

The FSA chose to discount a fine by 30 per cent in exchange for the firm agreeing to co-operate with the investigation at an early stage.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in