Some people ‘ignoring crucial name-check warnings when making bank transfers’
Less than a quarter of people said they would recognise that a ‘no match’ could be a warning sign of a scam.
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Around one in 12 (8%) people have pressed ahead with a bank transfer even when the payee account name and number do not exactly match, a survey has found.
Doing so could put them at risk of sending the money to a stranger’s account by mistake or to a fraudster who has deliberately given false details.
The Confirmation of Payee (CoP) service, which launched in 2019, checks whether the details entered match the account of the person or organisation being paid.
When you’re making a bank transfer and a warning flashes up to say that the account details don’t match, or can’t be checked at all, that should set alarm bells ringing straight away
Lloyds Bank, which commissioned the research, found less than half (47%) of people would carry out further checks before proceeding with a transaction when presented with a “Confirmation of Payee unavailable” message.
This often means the recipient bank or payment services provider is not signed up to the service, so the account details cannot be automatically checked.
Only 41% of those surveyed were familiar with CoP.
Less than a quarter (24%) said they would recognise that a “no match” could be a warning sign of a scam, the survey of more than 2,000 people across the UK found.
Lloyds Bank said its own analysis of outbound transfers made to all major banks and payment service providers last year indicated that transactions involving firms not using CoP were up to 100 times more likely to be reported as fraudulent by customers at a later date.
This difference in fraud rates cannot solely be attributed solely to CoP, and differences in investments in fraud prevention and detection measures will also play a part, it said.
Many banks have signed up to a voluntary industry code which reimburses victims of bank transfer scams in situations where neither the customer nor their bank is to blame. However concerns have been raised that the code has been applied inconsistently.
Some providers also have their own initiatives. TSB has its own fraud refund guarantee.
Nationwide Building Society, which has signed up to the industry code, also has a scam checker helpline that people can call if they are unsure whether something is a scam.
If people are given the go-ahead to make the payment but still fall victim to a bank transfer (APP) scam, they will be refunded in full under the society’s scam protection promise.
Fraudsters are trying to steal people’s money all the time, they never stop
Liz Ziegler, fraud prevention director at Lloyds Bank, said: “Fraudsters are trying to steal people’s money all the time, they never stop. We’re talking about organised crime gangs, constantly inventing new scams to dupe victims out of their hard-earned cash.
“So, when you’re making a bank transfer and a warning flashes up to say that the account details don’t match, or can’t be checked at all, that should set alarm bells ringing straight away.
“Stop, take notice and think about why that could possibly be the case. There’s a big chance it’s because you’re being scammed.
“We urge all payment providers to introduce Confirmation of Payee as quickly as possible. We can see it deters criminals now, and, if more people take notice of the warnings, it can help stop fraudsters in their tracks.”