Review of the year: Pensions

Be ready to work at 7

David Prosser
Friday 30 December 2005 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This was meant to be the year the Government finally solved Britain's pension crisis. Lord Turner of Ecchinswell's three-year inquiry into the demographic time-bomb delivered its interim report in 2004. But the former CBI director general reserved judgement on specific reforms until its final report in November.

The problem is a knotty one. People are living longer, swelling the number of pensioners in society. As the baby-boom generation retires over the next 20 years, the number of working people compared to pensioners will fall sharply, from 2.7 to 1 today to 1.1 to 1 by 2050. Fewer working people paying tax to support a growing number of pensioners will place an increasing strain on the public finances, as the state pension bill grows.

The Pensions Commission's brief - to propose affordable reforms to prevent workers facing poverty in retirement - was always tough. But Lord Turner had not banked on the additional political challenge of getting Gordon Brown on side.

Early leaks of Lord Turner's report suggested he was determined to suggest some politically uncomfortable ideas, including a gradual rise in the state pension age - a year each decade between 2020 and 2050, to 68 or 69. The Commission would also press for more generous state benefits. Finally, Lord Turner would suggest a new national pension scheme into which employees would automatically be enrolled and to which employers would have to contribute 3 per cent of workers' pay.

The Chancellor's views were made clear even before the report was officially published. A leaked letter from Brown to Lord Turner warned that the Treasury disagreed with the Commission's costings of its proposals - they would actually be much more expensive, the Chancellor warned.

Despite the frosty reception, Lord Turner stuck to his guns, confirming the Commission's findings at the end of November. Publicly, the Government welcomed the report, and Brown called for a "national debate" on pensions reform. Privately, the Treasury maintained that the proposals would be unaffordable.

Will 2006 be the year in which a consensus on pensions reform finally emerges? Don't bet on it.

John Hutton, Secretary of State at the Department for Work and Pensions, will deliver a White Paper on reform in the spring. But the Chancellor has his own agenda; Brown believes in the means-tested Pensions Credit, rather than a more generous basic state pension. And he is sceptical about spending more today on a problem so long-term that it may not become a real issue on his watch, whether he's at the Treasury or at Number 10.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in