Pension schemes fight for £100m a year VAT refund

 

David Prosser
Wednesday 31 August 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain's final salary pension schemes are taking the Government to the European Court of Justice in a bid to save £100m a year in taxes they claim they are being unfairly charged.

The claim, which is being jointly mounted by the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) and Wheels, the Ford pension scheme in the UK, is that an anomaly in British tax regulations means final salary plans are charged VAT on the fees they pay for investment management services. Many investment funds are exempt from VAT, including other types of pension scheme, but final salary plans do not satisfy the tests applied by the British tax authorities.

The case mirrors the successful claim made by investment trusts four years ago at the ECJ, in which that industry won the right to the same tax treatment as unit trusts and open-ended investment companies.

Joanne Segars, the NAPF's chief executive, said the investment trust ruling had given schemes hope of winning their claim. "We are pleased the case is going to the ECJ and we feel we have a strong case," she said. "Defined benefit pension funds should be exempt from paying VAT on investment management services."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in