L&G surprised as 80 per cent ignore its pensions advice

James Daley,Deputy Personal Finance Editor
Saturday 02 December 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

More than four in five pension savers with insurer Legal & General have opted to remain contracted out of the State Second Pension (S2P), despite being told that they are likely to be better off if they contract back into the scheme.

Earlier this year, L&G wrote to customers with its personal and group pension customers warning them that they should consider moving back into the state earnings-related pension scheme if they are currently contracted out.

L&G said the National Insurance rebates paid to people who use private schemes to opt out of S2P were no longer sufficiently generous for savers to be sure they would produce a better pension income outside the State scheme. However, 83 per cent of L&G's pension customers who have responded to the letters so far, have specifically asked to remain contracted out of S2P.

At first sight, the savers' rejection of L&G's advice that it now makes financial sense for most people to contract back in to S2P looks bizarre.

However, Tom McPhail, the head of pensions research at Hargreaves Lansdown, the independent financial advisers, said many people preferred to remain contracted out because they feared this Government or its successors would make cuts to S2P in the future, reducing the value of their final pension.

The current Government is already in the process of redesigning the state pension system - and S2P will eventually be converted into a flat-rate benefit under the reforms currently being proposed. Further changes to S2P could follow later.

"If you just look at the numbers, then most people should be contracted back in. But there are other factors and these clearly have influenced investors' decision-making," McPhail said. "These include retiring early, taking tax-free cash, and the simple appeal of having direct control over your own pension fund rather than having to trust the government not to fiddle with what's on offer."

Adrian Boulding, Legal & General's pensions strategy director, added: "While it is still early days and we haven't heard from everyone, those who reply quickly have the strongest views, and the results vindicate our stance on the importance of giving customers a choice regarding their contracting-out decision."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in