Government accused over 'shabby' pensions move

Gavin Cordon,Press Association
Saturday 12 December 2009 11:42 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government was today accused of treating pensioners in an "underhand and shabby" manner after it was disclosed that its promised 2.5 per cent rise did not apply to all elements of the state pension.

Chancellor Alistair Darling's commitment to increase the basic state pension was one of the few bright spots in his Pre-Budget Report on Wednesday, as he set out his plans to tackle Britain's ballooning £178 billion deficit.

However the BBC's Money Box programme reported that the uprating would not apply to extras, such as the State Earnings Related Pension (Serps), which will remain frozen.

Pensions Minister Angela Eagle was quoted by the programme as saying that the move would prevent "confusion and unfairness" because Serps affects company pension payments.

At the same time, the small earnings-related supplement called graduated pension which is paid to more than 10 million people, and the additional pension of £57.05 paid to 41,000 men who have wives under 60 were also said to have been held at this year's levels.

And an increase in the extra pension of £7 a week paid to 1.2 million over 60s who have delayed their retirement was reported to be under threat.

The freeze is estimated to save the Treasury £350 million in 2010-11.

The move was bitterly condemned by the National Pensioners Convention general secretary, Dot Gibson.

"Pensioners will be absolutely stunned that only part of their state pension is going to rise next year. This is unprecedented and the fact that the Chancellor never made this clear in his pre-budget statement looks underhand and shabby," she said.

"Over 2.5 million older people already live in poverty and millions more are struggling to meet the rising costs of living. This decision will certainly push more into financial hardship.

"We need a state pension that takes older people out of poverty - not one that pushes them further into it. It's simply unfair that the least able are being asked to shoulder the biggest burden of the recession."

A spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "The Chancellor has announced this week a 2.5% increase for the basic state pension. A further statement to Parliament on Monday will set out all other benefit upratings."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in