Expats call for fairer pension payouts

Half of pensioners abroad have had their pension frozen. That’s not right, they say

Simon Read
Friday 14 June 2013 18:50 BST
Comments
An elderly couple take a quite moment near the peak of Chopok mountain in Low Tatra mountains
An elderly couple take a quite moment near the peak of Chopok mountain in Low Tatra mountains (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Anger is growing among hundreds of thousands of British pensioners living abroad who are being denied their full state pension simply because of the country they live in.

Many have contacted us in recent weeks to complain about being treated like second-class citizens, only because of where they’ve chosen to live abroad. The problem is believed to affect around 565,000 UK pensioners who have had their pension frozen at the rate it was when they left the UK.

The state pension is guaranteed to rise each year, giving pensioners a small increase every 12 months. Of the 12 million people who receive the state pension, 1.2 million live abroad. It is among the latter group that a huge inequality has developed.

Those who have retired to the EU or more than 20 other countries – including the United States and Mauritius – see their state pension increased each year. But anyone who has moved to countries such as Australia, Canada, South Africa and a 100 more places has their pension frozen at the rate it was paid when they leave the country.

“A pensioner in one country is treated worse to one living in another country or in the UK,” points out Clive Walford who lives in Australia. “That clearly is discrimination.”

It means that 650,000 pensioners living abroad enjoy an increase in their retirement every year while 565,000 have to cope with what they were paid when they moved abroad.

For example, a man retiring at 65 in 1986 would have received a state pension of £38.70. If he had then moved to Canada he would still be getting the same £38.70. But if he had moved just across the border to the US he would today be getting £110.15, the same amount as UK-based pensioners get.

“Pensioners have been fighting for many years to get the frozen pension policy revoked,” points out Mr Walford. “The courts have in some cases agreed that frozen pensions were immoral or dishonourable but have had to finally judge that they are not illegal.

“MPs and others have also condemned it as illogical and unacceptable. Lord Goddard QC even called the state pension system a virtual contract – you get out pro-rata what you paid in. Therefore frozen pensions break that virtual contract.”

His argument – along with half a million other pensioners – is simple. All 1.2 million expat pensioners paid into the system, but more than half are getting a lot more out. That is simply unfair.

There was hope this week that the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, would implore David Cameron to support the uprating of state pensions for the 1560,000 expat pensioners living in Canada when the two premiers met.

But the International Consortium of British Pensioners is increasing demands for parity for all. The Government says doing so would cost £650m which it can’t afford, but research shows that uprating pensions according to age tiers could be much more affordable. John Markham, of the Consortium said: “Age tiering is an affordable, workable and fair solution to this ongoing travesty.”

You can find out more about the situation at pensionjustice.org

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in