Excessive exit fees hit pension transfers

 

Simon Read
Saturday 28 July 2012 00:28 BST
Comments
Tom McPhail says there is a strong case for a moratorium
Tom McPhail says there is a strong case for a moratorium

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pension firms are making it difficult for people to get better deals for their retirement fund by imposing huge "exit fees" for anyone daring to switch company, a retirement expert warned this week.

Tom McPhail, head of pensions research at advisers Hargreaves Lansdown, warned that pension exit penalties make it very difficult for investors to take control of their retirement fund and to make sure that they are getting good value for money.

"Even if they have checked what charges they are paying and how well their funds are performing, they still may not be able to move their money because their pension company is blocking the exit with a penalty for leaving," he said.

Mr McPhail said there is now a strong case to introduce a moratorium on exit penalties where they amount to more than a reasonable administration charge.

"Banks used to impose exorbitant charges whenever someone went into the red, just to write and tell them they were overdrawn," he pointed out. "In the end, consumer outrage put an end to that kind of exploitative behaviour. I think we are going to see similar pressure on pension companies with exit penalties."

He added that we need a simple way for investors to know whether their pension is a good one or not. "At the moment, disclosure rules mean that investors are swamped with too much information, making it hard for them to pick out the bits that really matter," he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in