Greater protection for sale-and-rent-back homeowners

Sunday 27 June 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

People who choose to enter into sale-and-rent-back property arrangements will find that they have greater protection under new Financial Service Authority rules.

For starters, the FSA says that it will ban "exploitative" and "emotive" advertising of the schemes, under which individuals sell their homes to a company on the understanding that they will be able to continue to occupy the property as tenants. The schemes have been roundly criticised by consumer groups for paying under market value and for instances where the former owner has been given notice to quit by their new landlords soon after the sale had gone through.

To counteract this, in future, the FSA says that sale-and-rent-back tenants should automatically be entitled to live in the property they have sold for a minimum five years as a tenant, provided they pay their rent. To prevent people entering into sale and rent back too lightly, the FSA will also ban cold calling and door-to-door leafleting. "With cases of vulnerable homeowners evicted from their homes six to 12 months after selling to unscrupulous sale-and-rent-back companies, tighter controls were vital," said Lesley Titcomb, the FSA director responsible for the mortgage sector. "The process is often used by those who want to sell in a hurry to stay in their home, and so it is vital that they are better protected during a difficult period financially."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in