Money Grouse: Credit tests irk rejects

Saturday 26 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

APPLYING for any form of credit and being unexpectedly turned down can be a frustrating experience for anybody, writes Caroline Merrell.

But it can be doubly irksome if the financial institution concerned then refuses to give any indication of what facet of the applicant's personal situation has led to the refusal.

Graham Douglas, a teacher from Brighton, ran into this problem last year when he applied for a new holographic Visa card from National & Provincial Building Society.

He was turned down because he did not reach the required number of points on the society's credit scoring system. He said: 'I received a computer printout explaining that I had not met the requirements, but I was welcome to reapply when my circumstances had changed. I did so this year, and received the same letter, so I telephoned and asked for more information.'

He said that when he contacted the building society, pointing out that he had an Access and a Visa card and therefore had a good reference from the society's credit reference agency, he was told that no single factor was responsible for the rejection of his application.

'I asked them to be more precise about which of my circumstances had to change, and again got the standard response that it is not their policy to be specific. Oftel has told me that they are within their rights to do this. My grouse is why all the secrecy?'

N&P said that it ran a credit scoring system where applicants were given a number of points according to criteria such as occupation, income and accommodation.

It said it understood why people wanted to know why they were turned down, but it refused to give details in order to prevent people falsifying new applications.

Other lenders also refuse to give rejected applicants an exact explanation of why they failed the credit test.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in