Money: Fears for capital cause S&P to drop high-income trust
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Save & Prosper has abandoned plans to launch a unit trust paying 10 per cent income, saying the capital was too vulnerable.
It was hoping to emulate the phenomenal success of derivative-based high-income funds from Hypo Foreign & Colonial and Morgan Grenfell. These funds have taken nearly pounds 500m from 70,000 unit-holders since their launch earlier this year.
F&C's fund, introduced in February, has maintained its capital value. The Morgan Grenfell fund was not launched until September.
But S&P felt there was a strong possibility that all its fund's capital would be used up over a 12-year period.
This week, the three investment houses held a meeting to pin down what it was that Hypo Foreign & Colonial and Morgan Grenfell could do that S&P couldn't. Both sides remained unconvinced by the other's argument.
A joint statement from Hypo Foreign & Colonial and Morgan Grenfell said: 'Neither the capital nor the level of income are guaranteed. Investors should remember that these funds are not comparable with building society accounts.'
The investment regulators Imro and SIB are maintaining a watching brief over the two funds on the market, and the other two main regulators, Fimbra and Lautro, have issued guidelines about the marketing of high-income funds this week.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments