Insurers urged to increase cover for road-rage incidents
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Car insurers have been urged to up their game over people hurt in road-rage incidents.
Consumer research company Defaqto has found that only a tiny fraction of car-insurance firms offer to pay anything to victims of road rage, even when the victims are subject to physical assault. Ninety four per cent of all motor insurance policies available in the UK in 2010 do not offer any cover for road rage, although this is a slight improvement from 2005, when the figure was 99 per cent. Even enlightened insurers, which cover road rage, impose benefit limits ranging from £500 to £5,000. They usually cover costs incurred for counselling, and some also give a benefit for physical assault.
This comes despite Defaqto indentifying cover for road-rage incidents as an important differentiator for consumers when deciding on a policy, particularly with drivers aged 55-plus.
Mike Powell, author of the Defaqto report, said: "Although this is a potentially useful benefit, the exclusions are very clear and could make claiming difficult. Exclusions include incidents caused by a relative ... or incidents caused or contributed by anything said or done by the insured person or passenger in the car. In the heat of the moment, many people may find it difficult to stay calm, and it could therefore be hard to prove that the insured person did not contribute to the situation."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments