Competition: Winner receives case of champagne: 100 guessed Lamont's measures
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THERE were thousands of entries in our competition to guess what the Chancellor had in his red box. And 100 readers managed to get their predictions right.
However, just one name was drawn out of the hat - Dr Ian Budden, an administrator with London University of Ealing. He will receive a case of champagne from accountants Coopers & Lybrand. The runner-up was Andrew Johnson of Glasgow. Although a non-smoker, he chose the 20 Raffles cigarettes as his prize rather than flowers.
Few people thought that personal allowances would rise by more than inflation - in fact, they were not increased at all. And most entrants judged correctly that the basic tax rate would remain at 25 per cent.
The most difficult question to judge for Moira Elms, the senior manager in the personal tax planning department of Coopers & Lybrand, was about increased relief for Lloyd's Names. The Chancellor presented a package of measures for Lloyd's Names that was tax neutral, with the relief element cancelled out by syndicate premiums being treated as trading profits.
On balance, said Ms Elms, it was decided that the answer to the question was that there was no increase in relief.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments