Children taught well in reception ‘likely to earn more than peers’ in future
Pupils in the ‘most effective’ reception classes can expect to earn between £2,000 and £7,500 more on average, a study has suggested.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Children who are taught well during their first year of primary school are likely to earn more than their peers in later life, a study has shown.
Pupils in the most effective reception classes can expect to earn between £2,000 and £7,500 more on average than their peers, research by Durham University and the Department for Education suggests.
The study estimates that the top 2.5% reception classes of 27 pupils could add between £50,000 and £200,000 to the UK economy – the equivalent of around £4,400 per pupil.
Research by Durham University has previously shown that children who were taught well in their first year of primary school go on to achieve better GCSE results in English and maths.
The latest report – titled The economic benefits of effective Reception classes in England – suggests future earnings are influenced by teachers when children are as young as four.
The social and economic returns from investments in high-quality reception classes may also be “much larger” than the study’s estimates, especially for disadvantaged pupils, the paper says.
Professor Peter Tymms, from Durham University’s School of Education, said: “We have previously shown that exceptional teaching in reception can have a long-term impact – up to GCSE level – but now, working with the Department for Education, we have been able to show that it has an influence on later earnings too.
“Many will be surprised to see this but it shows the importance of great teachers working with young children.”
Researchers used two previous studies – one on the impact of reception classes on GCSE attainment and the other on earnings returns associated with GCSEs – to estimate the changes in earnings.
A range of social and economic factors that could have skewed the results were taken into account – including children’s age, sex, ethnicity, special needs, English as an additional language and deprivation.
James Bowen, director of policy for school leaders’ union NAHT, said: “As this report shows, the early years of a child’s education are crucial to setting children up for the best success, both in terms of their future academic attainment and their life chances.
“While we should not be trying to ‘hothouse’ young children, it is clear that great teachers in reception classes make a real difference.
“However, we also need to recognise that the years before a child enters reception are just as important, and the challenges some children face start well before they arrive at school.”
A Department for Education spokesperson said: “Early literacy and numeracy can improve life chances, and findings from this analysis report shows the importance of investing in maths and English in primary schools.
“Our approach as a Government over the last decade has been on raising standards, particularly in primary schools, which is why we have introduced the phonics screening and multiplication tables checks, to improve children’s fluency in literacy and mathematics.”