But we don't know what to wear: It may have been politically incorrect to tell women how to dress, but some have confessed to Roger Tredre that they miss that kind of guidance

Roger Tredre
Friday 30 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DO WOMEN want to be told what to wear? At a time when fashion is going through a period of dramatic change it is worth posing the question again.

I used to think the answer was no, that women grew out of being told what to wear years ago. According to received wisdom, they started thinking for themselves at some time during the Seventies. By the mid-Eighties, the job of a fashion editor had changed beyond recognition. She no longer laid down the law to her readers. Her task was to encourage or to suggest new ways of dressing, but she dare not appear to be high-handed. She knew that her readers were independent spirits, sure of their own judgement.

For feminists, this was a good thing, too. The dos and don'ts of fashion magazines were part of the oppression of women. The disintegration of fashion by diktat was a welcome sign, a defining moment in the struggle for liberation.

But where does that leave us today? Many of my women friends confess they are mystified by current developments, freewheeling through umpteen different looks. Everything goes, say the fashion editors, but perhaps that's not what the reader wants to hear. Should she risk wearing a pair of flares? Should she splash out on a jacket by one of those strangely named Belgian designers?

This post-modernist free-for-all does not make shopping any easier. In recent seasons, designers have ransacked the Thirties, Forties, Fifties and Sixties. Now we are into the early Seventies, and the word is that the late Seventies will be next: punk and all. But it is becoming more complicated than that because all these retro influences are beginning to interweave.

High street stores are no better. Too many are like supermarkets: bewildering rows of products that make your head spin. Oh, for a few more little independent shops with strong- minded proprietors who tell you what looks good on you. Men are happy to be told what to wear. For the most part, we crave guidance and accept it with gratitude. Designers and retailers understand our insecurities, so they keep the message simple. Menswear stores are full of mini-dictators, making up their customers' minds for them. It does make clothes shopping easier.

Paradoxically, the freedom of modern fashion has sparked anxiety. We are living in an age of sensory overload in which one could argue that every garment is in vogue. My guess is that, while no one wants to return to lemming dressing, there is a genuine desire for guidance.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in