Words: Diplomacy

Nicholas Bagnall
Sunday 23 November 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The resolution of that unpleasant dust-up with Iraq is agreed to have been a triumph for diplomacy. But throughout its history the word has tended to have a bad press. "Conduct which is wily and subtle" declared the Encyclopedia Britannica in its 1877 edition, "without being directly false or fraudulent, is styled 'diplomatic'". Its 1911 edition, weighing its words, said that "what we know of diplomacy was long regarded... partly as a kind of activity morally somewhat suspect". Yet it had begun innocently enough. The Greek diploma had meant "a doubling", the verb diploein meant "to fold", and a diploma was a piece of folded paper, folded presumably to keep its contents from the casual eyes (assuming he was literate) of a messenger.

So a diploma came to be any official document; the universities grabbed it in the 17th century for the bits of paper they handed out to successful students. Diplomacy wasn't coined till later. Its first mention in the Oxford Dictionary is dated 1796. This was Edmund Burke, writing about what he called "the double diplomacy of France". Technically the word meant simply what the dictionary calls "the management of international relations by negotiation". But that "double" has an edge to it that has nothing to do with the innocent diploein of the ancient Greeks. Nor was Burke doing his francophobe act, for later he refers to "all our mendicant diplomacy", merely regretting its necessity in the national interest.

Then there was Disraeli, writing of "treachery and cowardice, doled out with diplomatic politesse".

It's not surprising that when we talk about a less than honest answer (perhaps to questions like "Do you like my hat?") we describe it as "a diplomatic reply".

All rather unfair to a useful and honourable profession, but there you are.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in