Priti Patel says making misogyny a hate crime would be ‘tokenistic’
Campaigners have called this “deeply problematic”
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Home Secretary Priti Patel has rejected calls to make misogyny a hate crime, amid concerns that it would be “more harmful than helpful” to women and girls who are victims of violence.
The Home Office cited findings by the Law Commission, which has stated that if this change were made, as campaigners have argued for, prosecutors would need to prove that a hate crime had occurred as part of a separate offence. This could make it harder to convict those guilty of domestic violence or sex offences.
The Commission also reported that the change would be “tokenistic”, as the most serious offences against girls and women might get missed. Patel has used these findings to explain the government position in its refusal to move forward in making misogyny a hate crime.
This issue has received much debate over the last year, in the wake of Sarah Everard’s murder, as many questioned what more could have been done to keep her – and other endangered women – safe.
Ruth Davison, CEO of domestic violence charity Refuge, has called the government’s position “deeply problematic” and “disappointing”.
“Refuge urges the Home Secretary, in the strongest possible terms, to reconsider,” she said in a statement. “Crimes committed against women that are driven by misogyny, must be acknowledged as being hate crimes. In the same way that crimes motivated by racism, disablism, religious discrimination, homophobia or transphobia are.”
Davison has suggested that new law does not need to be created – instead, she says, existing hate crime legislation should be extended to cover “offences motivated by hostility to the victim’s sex or gender”.
She adds: “The Home Secretary has spoken repeatedly about her commitment to tackling violence against women and girls, so we are deeply disappointed that she does not consider crimes such as street and online harassment serious enough to be acknowledged as hate crimes.”
If you need to talk to someone about domestic violence, please call Refuge’s hotline on 0808 2000 247.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments