Men are ‘worse allies than they think’ in the workplace, study finds

More men than women think they are ‘active allies’ at work

Kate Ng
Sunday 09 October 2022 13:00 BST
Comments
Emma Watson: 'Men need to fight for gender equality'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Men are more likely to think they are active allies and advocates for gender equality in the workplace than women do, research suggests.

A survey of 1,150 workers in mid-sized Fortune 500 companies found that men were significantly more likely than women to believe that they and other male workers practice allyship at all levels of leadership.

The study, carried out by the Integrating Women Leaders (IWL) Foundation, also found that men were more likely (88 per cent) to believe their organisation is making progress to advance women into leadership roles compared to the latter (72 per cent).

More than half (60 per cent) of men believe their company is more transparent around progress in diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices, while just 46 per cent of women believe the same.

Among the executive level of leadership, 77 per cent of men believe that most men within their organisation were either “active allies” or “public advocates” for gender equity, compared to less than half (45 per cent) of women.

The figures drop when participants were asked about lower levels of leadership, with 67 per cent of men and 36 per cent of women believing the same about mid- to senior management, and 51 per cent of men and 28 per cent of women about lower management.

However, the survey found that women were more likely to recommend their organisation as a good workplace and planned to stay when they saw progress in advancing women and underrepresented groups.

Allyship training could make a difference, the study suggests. While such programmes are relatively new to many organisations, almost half of the participants were aware of allyship training in their companies.

However, of those, just over a fifth (22 per cent) had actually participated in the training. When asked why they didn’t participate, the reasons male respondents gave included that they were too busy; were not invited; did not see the need for allyship; did not know how to get involved; or were more interested in other employee resource groups.

But among the men who did attend allyship training, the study found that they were two to three times more likely to be aware of gender-biased behaviours that commonly occur in the workplace that do not benefit women.

Such behaviours include interrupting women when they are speaking, questioning their expertise or failing to give them credit for their work.

To promote allyship among men and women and improve gender equity in the workplace, the Harvard Business Review recommends making it an “organisational value and priority”.

Companies can do this by ensuring senior leaders advocate for the importance of allyship vocally and provide resources for employees to take action.

The publication also suggests that organisations create a “community of allies” where employees can learn and share their experiences with others in order to support one another.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in