The target

Two former ministers on public office and private lives

Tim Yeo; Alan Clark
Saturday 22 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"HAVING THE details of your private life investigated by the Press is unpleasant. However, I continue to believe that this kind of scrutiny is part of the price of entering public life. People who seek public office cannot expect the same privacy that others are entitled to enjoy. Nevertheless, I worry about the damage that is often inflicted on innocent people caught up in circumstances not of their own choosing. There are situations - like mine - where nobody involved sought any publicity and where none of the entirely private matters eventually revealed by the Press related directly to the public responsibilities of anyone connected to the case. Under these circumstances it is regrettable that families who have no public role can be besieged in their homes, that subterfuges to obtain private information are apparently legitimate and that children can be subjected to abusive and distressing questioning in front of their friends. I do not advocate protection from Press scrutiny for public figures. I have never sought it for myself. But I wonder whether the unrestricted pursuit of people not holding public office really serves the public interest."

"IT IS AN uncomfortable feeling to have 30 or 40 photographers outside your front door plus television crews with generator vans and a general atmosphere of being in the dock in some way. In my case I have always made it a rule not to make any comment on the behaviour or the motives of the various young ladies who are being manipulated by their public relations advisers. I think that a personal relationship is a personal relationship and if they want to publicise theirs it's down to them, and I've always said that I hope that they are being properly rewarded for doing so.

It was actually my wife Jane who sorted me out when I was getting a slight persecution mania about this on about the third day of the siege [in the Harkess affair, see Number 21] when she said: 'Do pull yourself together and stop whingeing. Think how much you would be enjoying it if it was being written about one of your colleagues.' And I think that actually illustrates that we don't really have any right to complain; it's all part of the fun, all part of the game. But I must emphasise that I don't really regard sexual misbehaviour, unless it is against the law, as being culpable - it is not the same as taking bribes, however they may be concealed or dressed up."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in