Sari seems to be the hardest word...

Naseem Khan
Friday 26 July 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Multicultural society - we are frequently told - means that everyone has more options. Elizabeth David introduced the aubergine, Kenneth Lo popularised the wok and Birmingham gave us the balti, However non-Asian women have been more nervous about trying out Indian dress than they have been in playing with spices. This is of course understandable. If you go out in a saggy sari or make an ass of yourself in a shalwar, then all the world - and quite a few Asians - will be there to see your shame. So is there a clear road to follow that will help the non-Asian avoid danger spots?

The first rule is to be wary of the sari. It looks extraordinarily innocent, this simple five yard length of cloth, and is utterly seductive as a garment. The range of patterns, dyes and fabrics is fabulous - from ikats of the north-east to the rich warm silks of the south - and women look wonderful in them, gliding like swans. Wrap it round you though, and you'll see its simplicity really is an illusion. First, the length. Western women are worried by clothes that skim the ground, and tend to wear a sari - inelegantly - at ankle level, this spoils the line.The pleats that are tucked in at the front are another crucial area. If they are not knife- sharp, they will bulge and result in you looking like a lumpy bag of aloo's. And then there's the pullu, the end of the sari that hangs loose over one shoulder down the back. That ought to be at about the level of the back of the knee: if it's longer it trails and looks stupid. If it's shorter it will slip off and make you look indecorous.

All in all, the shalwar-kameez is a safer bet. It exists conveniently in the meeting ground between eastern and western dress, and is less of a statement - the more culturally-specific sari lays women open to the assumption of having-an Asian husband. And unlike the sari, it is affected by broad swings of fashion - wide trousers or tight ones, long tunics or short ones, ethnic detail, contrasting colours. In short, you can have more fun with a shalwar-kameez, more mobility and a greater degree of choice in finding something that suits your shape. Plain sailing then? Not quite. You'll, need to be careful with the cut. A well cut kameez has a sense of movement to it, and should make you look - as Jemima Khan pointed out - subtly sexy. And watch out for the tricky dupalla or accompanying shawl. Worn by real doyennes, with a kind of light but precise casualness, it looks like what it is - the final touch of class that binds the whole outfit together. The secret with a dupalla is boldness. If you've got it, flaunt it.

Naseem Khan is a contributor to Chic Thrills: A Fashion Reader edited by Juliet Ash and Elizabeth Wilson (Pandora, 2nd edition July 1996).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in