Piers Morgan ‘could have injected information from phone hacking into Prince Harry stories’
Prince Harry alleges journalists at MGN gathered private information about him by intercepting his personal voicemails
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Piers Morgan could have “injected” information obtained by phone hacking into news stories about Prince Harry, a court heard.
The former editor of the Mirror was named by the Duke of Sussex’s lawyer, David Sherborne, during the ongoing trial at the High Court.
Harry, 38, alleges journalists at MGN (Mirror Group Newspapers) gathered private information about him by intercepting his personal voicemails when he was a teenager.
During questioning of the Mirror’s then royal correspondent, Jane Kerr, Mr Sherborne highlighted articles that appeared to quote a private conversation between William and Harry and the private thoughts of Harry’s father, Charles.
The lawyer claimed these details were “information that would precisely have come from people listening to voicemail messages.”
Prince Harry court – latest: Piers Morgan ‘could have injected’ phone-hacked material into stories
Watch: Court arrivals as Prince Harry’s phone hacking case against Mirror publisher continues
9 bombshell claims from Prince Harry in first witness box showdown
Prince Harry court case: Where is Duke of Sussex staying during phone hacking trial?- Prince Harry urged to provide ‘hard evidence’ to back phone hacking claims
Ms Kerr repeatedly denied she was involved in phone hacking and insisted she would not have used information that came from an illegal source. “I wouldn’t even have known how,” she added.
She told the court that her editor, Mr Morgan, occasionally contributed to stories. “He might say he had a been speaking to somebody at the palace,” Ms Kerr said. “He took a really genuine interest in royal stories.”
Mr Sherborne later suggested that “Mr Morgan may have injected information obtained from voicemails.” Ms Kerr replied: “I can’t say he didn’t but I think it would be highly unlikely.”
Newspaper stories about phone calls between Prince Harry and his then-girlfriend Chelsy Davy were also “deeply suspicious”, the lawyer claimed.
One article reported that Ms Davy had given Harry a “tongue-lashing” over the phone while he was staying at Highgrove. In another story, a reference to a call lasting 30 minutes was removed before it was published.
Mr Sherborne said it was cut out because it “gave the game away that there had been blagging of call data”. Ms Kerr said she could not remember the source of the information.
Before she finished giving evidence, the judge, Mr Justice Fancourt, asked her if she would ever “make up” quotes from sources for her stories. Ms Kerr replied: “Never. I would feel a certain responsibility to the palace. I relied on them for access and access would have been cut off otherwise.”
Harry’s claim against MGN is being heard alongside claims by Fiona Wightman, the ex-wife of comedian Paul Whitehouse, and the former Coronation Street actors Michael Le Vell and Nikki Sanderson.
Ms Sanderson is due to give evidence on Friday about “very hurtful” stories which appeared in the Sunday Mirror and the People newspapers between 2003 and 2009.
The Hollyoaks actress claims she became “paranoid” and was left wondering “who she could trust” as a result of the articles.
One article, headlined “Nikki’s fun and games with Man Utd star” wrongly suggested she was having an affair with footballer Paul Tierney, he said.
Another, about the end of her relationship with Jamie Meakin, made her angry because she wrongly believed he had sold the story to the Sunday Mirror.
She said a story describing her father as a “love rat” and a “4-times wed womaniser” was particularly upsetting. Ms Sanderson added in her witness statement: “This isn’t celebrity gossip, it’s my life.”
At the time Ms Sanderson did not suspect she was hacked and believed the newspapers were being tipped off by friends, colleagues or members of the public, the court heard.
She had not heard of the Leveson Inquiry into phone hacking and only made her legal claim in 2020 after her Hollyoaks colleague Gary Lucy suggested she might have a case, the court heard.
The case continues.