‘We should be ashamed’: How people are reacting to Meghan and Harry’s interview with Oprah

Everyone has something to say, and no one can agree

Josh Marcus
San Francisco
Monday 08 March 2021 00:40 GMT
Comments
Meghan tells Oprah she 'didn't want to be alive anymore'
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle sat down for a tell-all TV event on Sunday, and the couple’s first joint interview in years provoked a range of reactions – and that’s before it has even aired in some countries.

The interview itself was a chance to clear the air after the couple stepped back as senior members of the royal family, and social media was alight over the bombshell revelations in the show.

Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan put things succinctly: “We’re going to need a longer show.”

Many seized on the revelation from Prince Harry that his father allegedly stopped taking his calls as he prepared to step back from the royal family.

Follow Harry and Meghan Oprah interview live: Latest news and updates

Vulture writer Chris Murphy noted how people across his timeline were all astounded by the story.

Read more: Follow live updates on Oprah’s interview with Meghan and Harry

“Ghana celebrated its independence from Britain yesterday.  Harry and Meghan speak out on Oprah today. Feeling the anti-colonial ancestral energy this weekend. Abeg, let the the imperial tea be spilled!” wrote the Washington Post’s Karen Attiah.

Netflix’s Sylvia Obell, and many others, were just as shocked by comments from Harry about how he believed his mother, the late Princess Diana, left him an inheritance with a premonition that he may someday need the money after leaving the royal family.

“They’re surviving off of the money Diana left for Harry, “’I think she saw it coming,’” Ms Obell wrote, reflecting what many were thinking with one word: “WHEW.”

As the couple faces wave after wave of media scrutiny, comparisons to Harry’s mother, the late Princess Diana, also cropped up. During the conversation , Prince Harry said he long feared “history repeating itself”, with Meghan facing the same kind of ravenous press his mother did before she died in a car crash in 1997 while being pursued by paparazzi. Many online reflected on the country’s experience with Diana, and how those lessons applied today.

“I recall when Diana died, the princes were in isolation in Balmoral but they had to be dragged back to London so the British public could see the “boys public sadness” to satiate their need for some weird grief porn that was gripping the nation” wrote comedian Janey Godley.

“As a Brit, I feel it’s important to say, many of us believe Meghan & Harry. We remember how Diana was treated. We know how The Firm operate. The ones who believe the media & The Firm, tend to be right wingers, racists & Brexiteers. Not all Brits,” wrote @JamesPrescott77.

The late princess was such a heavy presence throughout the interview one Twitter posted a video of a ghost from the animated classic Spirited Away chasing the Queen through the halls of Buckingham Palace.

There seemed to be a general consensus that the press hadn’t quite gotten it right when covering the royals, allowing the hunger for tabloid drama to demoralise the people they were covering. One could see this dynamic in the enthusiastic reception to an old interview clip of Harry, talking about how nice it is to be away from the papers of England while completing his military service.

“I don’t want to sit around at Windsor,” Harry says in the clip, which has more than 350,000 views. “I just generally don’t like England that much, and it’s nice to be away from all the press and the papers and all the sh** that they write.”

During the interview with Oprah, the royal couple revealed they would be having a baby girl, and some online said they were glad the Duke and Duchess had left the country so she wouldn’t have to grow up in front of UK tabloids, who Prince Harry described as having a dangerously intertwined relationship with the royal family.

“Not them having a little girl...” @Joymemo3 wrote, including a photo, fittingly, of a teary-eyed Oprah. “I’m glad they left because I can only imagine the scrutiny that she would face especially with the media.”

For everyone feasting on the gossip or reflecting history, it seemed there were just as many online arguing that the whole affair was getting far too much attention.

With much of the world’s population still not vaccinated for Covid, many thought the media focus shouldn’t be on a pair of royal individuals, but the raging pandemic.

“This is exactly why this #HarryandMeghanonOprah interview is going to have the opposite effect that they intended Ordinary people just threw up in their mouths a little watching them tell their woe is me story, having $10 million and free mansions to live in during covid,” Twitter user @kayee9999 as the television special progressed.

“Is it just me but,” user @naniftrauts added, “in a Covid world where countries are struggling with vaccines, people are dying, economies in huge debt and people are losing their livelihoods, isn’t #HarryandMeghanonOprah just totally irrelevant indulgence on their part?”

Numerous users thought more scrutiny should go towards Prince Andrew, over his alleged links with Jeffrey Epstein and the allegation of abuse against him, which he and the palace emphatically deny.

“Really not interested in this,” @Sctotsterahoy wrote. “Would like to see a trial though.”

But the criticisms weren’t just abstract: some went directly at the royal couple, and the crown at large, over the subject of the interview.

Writer Craig Stone noted that at the end of the day, despite all the Duke and Duchess have faced, they’re still extremely privileged outcasts from an extremely family.

“I look forward to watching a billionaire question two millionaires on how hard it’s been leaving billionaires, to continue being millionaires,” he wrote ahead of the show airing. “Thoughts & prayers to Harry and Meghan in this difficult time, as they adapt to new staff AND a new mansion.”

And some saw a note of hypocrisy in taking to the media to vent about the frustrations of living life in the spotlight of the media.

"Harry and Meghan’s interview with Oprah Winfrey is set to be the TV viewing appointment of the year – possibly the decade. This being the couple who fled the UK to enjoy a ‘quiet life’...” wrote @lacey_butcher

Piers Morgan was even more critical, suggesting Meghan, a former actress, was once again pretending during her interview.

“Is it too late for Oscar nominations? #meghan” the presenter wrote.

Finally, there were those tired of the royals altogether, like @LisatheSimpson, who wrote, “I hope this marks the start of a nation questioning the institutions and norms it accepts as parts of British life. We should be ashamed we still have a monarchy, we should be ashamed that this couple were hounded out of the country.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in