Meghan Markle ‘obviously confused and clearly misinformed’ with claim about earlier wedding, says former official
The comments follow Meghan’s claim that she and Prince Harry married three days prior to the official royal wedding in their backyard
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The former official who issued the licence for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s wedding has described Meghan as “obviously confused and clearly misinformed” after she claimed the couple were “married” three days prior to their official royal wedding in May 2018.
Meghan dropped the bombshell revelation that she and Harry had a secret ceremony with the Archbishop of Canterbury in their backyard three days before the official ceremony at Windsor Castle during her explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey earlier this month.
The claim aroused doubt among viewers, who pointed out that in the UK a legally-binding marriage must be solemnized by a member of the clergy in either a church or in a place specified in a special license, such as a chapel, and in the presence of two witnesses (who do not include the bride and groom).
Now Stephen Borton, the former chief clerk at the Faculty Office, has challenged the claims made by Meghan, stating: “They did not marry three days earlier in front of the Archbishop of Canterbury”.
Read more:
Speaking to The Sun, he said: “The Special Licence I helped draw up enabled them to marry at St George's Chapel in Windsor and what happened there on 19 May 2018 and was seen by millions around the world was the official wedding as recognised by the Church of England and the law.
“What I suspect they did was exchange some simple vows they had perhaps written themselves, and which is fashionable, and said that in front of the Archbishop or, and more likely, it was a simple rehearsal.”
He added that Meghan “is obviously confused and clearly misinformed”.
Church of England guidelines support the claim that the “wedding” that took place three days before the royal ceremony is likely to have been purely symbolic, rather than a legal exchange of vows.
However, the Rev Tiffer Robinson, a Church of England vicar in Suffolk, wrote on Twitter that Meghan is “entitled to consider it her marriage if she wants to”.
They continued: “Americans are much less concerned with the specifics of marriage law than English clergy.
“Most of their wedding ceremonies aren’t legal weddings … saying ‘we really got married three days before in a secret ceremony’ is not actually the same as saying they were legally wed three days before everyone thought they were.”
When approached for comment by The Independent, a spokesperson for Lambeth Palace said: “The Archbishop does not comment on personal or pastoral matters so we aren’t commenting.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments