The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
King Charles III reportedly reconsidering number of ‘stand-in’ royals
Monarch has ‘counsellers of state’ who can fulfil certain duties if he is unable to do so
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.King Charles III may increase the number of senior royals who are allowed to stand in for him during periods of absence, according to reports.
There are currently five “counsellors of state” who may represent the King if he is unable to complete an official duty, such as sign acts of parliament into law.
These are the Prince of Wales, heir to the throne, Camilla, Queen Consort, the Duke of Sussex, Prince Andrew and Princess Beatrice.
However, some have called for this list to be expanded as the Duke of Sussex and Prince Andrew are no longer “working” members of the royal family.
According to ITV, plans are being considered to increase the number of counsellors and may be completed by the end of this year, in time for the King and Camilla’s overseas tours in 2023.
The issue was raised in the House of Lords on Monday (24 October) by Labour peer Viscount Stansgate, when he asked the government if it had plans to amend Clause 6 of the 1937 Regency Act.
“Does the Minister not think it time to approach the King to discuss the potential amendment of this Act... which at the moment defines regents in relation to their line of succession to the Crown?” Stansgate asked.
“Otherwise, are the Government happy to continue with a situation where the counsels of state and regency powers may be exercised by the Duke of York or the Duke of Sussex, one of whom has left public life and the other of whom has left the country?”
Lord True, the Lord Privy Seal and leader of the House of Lords said he would not discuss private conversations he has had with the royal family but said the government “will always consider” the arrangements needed to “ensure resilience in our constitutional arrangements”.
He added that the point of accession – when a new monarch takes the throne – has previously proven a “useful opportunity” to consider the current arrangement.
The Independent has contacted Buckingham Palace for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments