Patently absurd: a male chastity belt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE ANTI-RAPE invention patented by Charles Barlow in 1977 ('An anti-rape device to be inserted into the vaginal cavity'), featured last week on this page, was obviously not only designed to catch a rapist. Clearly, its 'three spears with harpoon-like barbs' were also intended to punish him in the appropriate place at the same time, almost by confiscation of the offending equipment.
Unfortunately all that this would have achieved (in the unlikely event of the device going into production) would have been to slam the stable door on the thief while letting the horse escape for ever. In other words, it would have done nothing to prevent the rape. As the gynaecologist Shirley Bond said, 'You might as well opt for the medieval chastity belt - stop the penis getting there in the first place.'
That could well have been one of the ideas an earlier American inventor, Michael McCormick, had in mind when he applied for Patent No 587,994 from the same US Patent Office. The patent was for a Male Chastity Belt.
If protecting women from rape was part of McCormick's intention, he failed to say so; the primary purpose of the Male Chastity Belt was to protect the man - in this case, from his own instincts. The patent specification was filed in 1896 in San Francisco, a town where females were in short supply: the Wild West was considered no place for women, at any rate respectable ones. So McCormick came up with an invention that would, to quote his specification, 'prevent involuntary nocturnal seminal emissions, control waking thoughts and prevent self-abuse'.
The 'surgical appliance' consists of a 'plate, of any suitable material' to be secured to the body with a belt, 'and having an aperture through which the proper member is to be passed'. On to the plate are mounted a series of 'pricking points'. 'When, from any cause, expansion in the organ begins, it will come in contact with the pricking-points,' McCormick explained, resulting in the 'necessary pain and warning sensation.' This would be sufficient, he conjectured, either to wake the wearer when asleep, or, if conscious, to divert his thoughts from 'lascivious channels'.
'Voluntary self-abuse will be checked,' he wrote, as the wearer would 'not take the trouble to relieve himself of the appliance, and cannot continue his practice without removing it.'
An 'irresponsible wearer' might have it permanently attached, he added as an afterthought.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments