Parents pay price of school success

Lesley Gerard
Tuesday 09 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A battle for places at one of London's most popular comprehensives has reached fever pitch after appeals by 47 families were thrown out.

In a move likely to please neither Haringey council, nor parents of excluded children, an independent appeals panel granted places at Muswell Hill's Fortismere school to only 13 extra pupils.

Now a number of the 47 protesters whose children have been allocated places at three less popular schools - White Hart Lane and Langham in Tottenham and St David and St Katherine's in Hornsey - are appealing to the local government ombudsman, which investigates maladministration. Some want to teach children at home.

Christine Hall, one campaigner, said: 'We want to know what monitoring procedure there is over the panel's decision and who they are answerable to.' Her daughter has been given a place at Fortismere after qualifying earlier through the waiting list.

Haringey council said the appeals system panel was made up of a volunteer parent, a teacher and a school governor . 'They were chosen as independent individuals, none of them has links with Fortismere. They interviewed all parents who appealed against the allocations, treated each case on its merits, considered social and medical factors, and spent hours on their decision.'

The row began in May when it emerged that 407 children had listed Fortismere as their first choice comprehensive. It had space for 206.

The school became over-subscribed after appearing among the top 100 state schools in government exam league tables. Good GSCE results also attracted parents who would have paid for independent schooling.

That narrowed the unofficial catchment area. Children from primaries that had fed Fortismere were no longer eligible.

The protesters object to Langham and White Hart Lane because they are on the other side of the borough. Neither has the record of academic achievement of Fortismere.

White Hart Lane finished low in the league table and an Ofsted report on Langham said the curriculum lacked breadth and balance, although its standards were found to be improving. The Labour council's new education chairman, Lucy Craig, said: 'Fortismere is a victim of its own success.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in