Outtakes
Paul M Smith explains his fabricated images of war
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.`I joined the Royal Engineers in 1985, and after taking evening classes in photography, I was given the job of photographer for the regiment for about three years. It was mostly handshakes, really, but I also went on exercises, and so I ended up with a lot of pictures of people acting out war and playing at being soldiers. After leaving the Army, I did a fine art degree and then two years at the Royal College of Art. These three photos are from the work I produced at the end of the Royal College course. I started looking at images representing war, and found there was quite a lot of debate as to whether they were real or acted out. The first picture (top) is inspired by Robert Capa's dying soldier picture from the Spanish Civil War. If it was posed, was it still a true document of the Spanish Civil War? Or was it then not an image of war, even though it was a massive icon of war?
All the parts in all the photographs were taken by me, but people don't notice this immediately. The various shots of me in each picture were taken in situ - in this case, on a beach - and then put together on computer. With the second photographl, I was thinking about the macho element of the Army. As a bloke, you can't wear make-up, but in the Army you can cover yourself in camouflage cream and call it macho. The third image was based on a still from Vietnam.
These photographs are also about the fantasy of battle - there's no blood or guts in this kind of image. If you're a man, you can come into that fantasy. I don't think I've ever met a man who didn't play soldiers as a kid, so I think people make a connection with these pictures whether they've been in the Army or not.' Scott Hughes
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments