On cinema

John Lyttle
Monday 11 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Being a child of the Seventies, I recall a time when horror movies were actually horrible. Heads would roll, bellies would burst and arms and legs went their own ways, even though they were happier together. Ah, happy days: The Hills Have Eyes, I Spit on Your Grave, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Cannibal Holocaust, Romero's zombie flicks. Not to mention the rise and rise of splatter as pioneered by Dick Smith (Scanners), Rick Baker (An American Werewolf in London), Ron Bottin (The Howling) and Tom Savini (Dawn of the Dead), men who made old gore hounds like Hershell Gordon Lewis (Two Thousand Maniacs]) seem positively vegetarian.

Funnily enough, watching such 'irredeemable' material never made me want to mug, mutilate or murder. Fantasy, no matter its pretensions to authenticity, remains fantasy. This I knew from living in Belfast. A vampire's kiss is nothing compared to the damage 5lbs of gelignite can do. Horror movies don't impact on reality; they're a refuge from reality, a chance to discharge the dark.

This is lost on moral panic-mongers, the types who originally got the 'video nasties act passed in the mid-Eighties. The fact that the level of violent crime has rocketed since (so much for cause and effect) didn't stop a recent replay of the same old 'horror corrupts scare and another level of censorship being imposed on video, this time for generic horror fare already defanged, deballed and depleted by the existing legalisation.

Just clock Needful Things (above). I could take my nieces to it and they wouldn't turn a hair. I mean, Western civilisation must be crumbling if a person can't go to the cinema and puke anymore. . .

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in