Nigella Lawson apologises for 1993 comments on person’s choice to have gender surgery
A ‘gracious acceptance’ was then shared by Christie Elan-Cane about whom the comments were made
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nigella Lawson has issued an apology for comments she made about a non-gendered activist in a newspaper column she wrote titled “Not a suitable case for treatment” 27 years ago.
In the article from 1993 for the Evening Standard, TV chef Lawson described the removal of Christie Elan-Cane’s breasts and womb as “brutal surgery” with no “medical justification”.
Elan-Cane, who identifies as non-gendered and uses the pronoun ‘per’ shared a picture of the article on Twitter this week with the caption “no trans ally of mine”.
It was following wide praise of Lawson for sharing a pro-trans Independent article on Twitter, on 29 August, with the caption: “A small still voice of calm”.
Elan-Cane captioned the newspaper clipping: “As I said before, I'm not letting this go. @Nigella_Lawson's words @EveningStandard Oct '93 to be precise. No apology in 27 years. Has she changed? I don't know. I don't care. No #trans ally of mine.”
Elan-Cane followed up per tweet a few days later by writing “@Nigella_Lawson didn't care about me when she wrote this offensive diatribe in @EveningStandard that was read by millions in London & across the south east.
“And I don't care if I have to shout from the rooftops that she should apologise now for these disgusting comments.”
Several hours later, Lawson replied to Elan-Cane with an apology, writing: “And I am very glad to have the opportunity to apologise . While I certainly meant no harm, unfortunately that doesn’t mean I didn’t harm.
“And I’m sorry. I hope that the past 27 years have been rich and happy ones for you.”
Elan-Cane then replied to accept the apology, writing: “Thank-you @Nigella_Lawson. Apology accepted.”
Lawson added: “I appreciate that very much. Thank you for your gracious response.”
Praising the apology, one Twitter user wrote: “This has been heartening. Another example of learning you’ve unintentionally harmed when you did not know better, though perhaps ought to have known better, and owning that past self in a humble kind apology. Both people here absolutely awesome.”
The TV chef and columnist’s 1990s article discussed Elan-Cane’s transition after per story appeared on Tuesday Lives on Radio 4.
The comments about Elan-Cane’s surgery read: “Of course, it is Christie Elan-Cane’s body - [pers] to mutilate as [per] wishes. But behind the desire for self-mutilation surely lies the most-troubling self-hatred ([per] made no bones about [per] disgust at femininity) and that’s not the kind of thing you can excise with a surgeon’s scalpel.”
Lawson concluded that she felt Elen-Cane “needed help, not surgery”.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments