Network: Microsoft vs Netscape in a bruising battle of the browsers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PC Magazine put Communicator and Internet Explorer to the test in its Usability Lab. And the winner by a split decision is ...
The Internet is undoubtedly one of the fastest moving technologies ever to hit the computing world. In little over two years it has changed the way we communicate, search for information and buy products. But to take advantage of all the latest features on the Net you will need a suitable browser.
With this much power at stake, the battle to control our use of the Net and to own the preferred browser is vicious, unrelenting, and very lucrative. The main rivals are Microsoft's Internet Explorer 4.0, and Netscape's Communicator 4.03. Both of these products have browsers at their core, but, in an ever-increasing effort to provide a more appealing product, they are augmented by mail clients, conferencing applications, HTML authoring tools and "push" clients (providing regular, automated updates of specific Web content such as news).
Microsoft and Netscape have been keeping a close eye on each other with the result that the features of both offerings are virtually the same. In the January edition of PC Magazine, both browsers were put throughout their paces in the Usability Lab to determine if this "feature creep" has been at the expensive of usability.
The results were interesting. The usual trade-off applies: more features equals less usability. Both products now require careful configuration, and owing to the complexity of their features, they aren't for the fainthearted. The rich e-mail features on both products look and work well (just don't send an e-mail to anyone not using the same sophisticated technology because they won't be able to read it). However, don't get either product for their conferencing capabilities. Remember, this is an immature technology working across an unpredictable carrier and it just doesn't work - yet.
Overall, the usability testers had a mixed reaction to Internet Explorer and Communicator. Both are at a point where an emotional element has become almost indistinguishable from the technicalities of the products. This perhaps explains why, despite an objectively better experience with Internet Explorer, some of the testers felt that they were more satisfied with Communicator.
However, it was felt that Explorer was more comprehensible and usable than Communicator, as the former had a more consistently usable interface throughout and it integrated better with the desktop. For its slight edge in its usability lab scores, PC Magazine awarded Internet Explorer 4.0 an Editor's Choice Award. For more information, see our Web site.
PC Magazine
http://www.pcmag.co.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments