Road safety: The traffic-light statistic that has cyclists seeing red
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The pointless war of the roads between cyclists ("Lycra louts") and motorists ("murderers") has flared again, ignoring the fact they are generally the same people.
This time, the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM), a road safety charity, has given ammunition to bike haters by muddying a "poll" (online survey) with the misleading headline: "More than half of cyclists jump red lights."
IAM revealed when pressed that just 2 per cent of only 1,600 respondents confessed to regular light-jumping, 12 per cent did it sometimes, 25 per cent rarely and 19 per cent once or twice.
This came too late for some media outlets, who regurgitated the first figure, boosting the image, that will now remain online, of cyclists as regular rule-breakers asking for trouble.
The real revelation (if there were one) was that many cyclists jump red lights due to dangerous road design, and drivers who invade the cyclists' boxes at the head of many junctions. I frequently jump red lights, if I endanger no other road users, if it's a choice between that or waiting in the shadow of a revving lorry.
What IAM should have done is taken the opportunity, as it has done before, to highlight flaws in road safety so that it might be improved. What we should all do in the meantime, is obey the code more often and call a truce so that dodgy stats aren't abused in the first place.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments