Jaguar F-Type or Porsche 911 - Which makes the better used coupe?
Three years after the Jaguar F-Type Coupe’s launch, does it make a better second-hand buy than its Porsche 911 archrival?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Beat the Porsche 911. That was Jaguar’s main aim when it introduced the F-Type Coupe back in 2014.
Easier said than done, of course, and the British marque didn’t quite succeed – but, three years on, the Jag’s depreciation makes it a very tempting second-hand buy. We test both models in used form to see how they compare now.
The cars
Jaguar F-Type Coupe V6 S (2014-now)
List price when new: £60,250
Price now: £39,000*
Porsche 911 Carrera PDK (2011-2016)
List price when new: £75,897
Price now: £60,000*
On the road
Who needs a big V8 or V10 powerplant to deliver supercar pace when you’ve got these cars? The Porsche’s 3.4-litre doesn’t need any form of turbo or supercharging to produce 345bhp, and it sounds incredible even beyond 7000rpm thanks to its raucous optional sports exhaust.
A supercharger pushes the output of the Jaguar’s 3.0-litre V6 to 375bhp, but the car’s extra weight results in slower acceleration than its rival here. Even so, 0-60mph in 4.7sec is pretty impressive – and the exhaust is even louder than that of the 911. It howls and pops even during urban driving, especially in Dynamic mode.
This setting also sharpens the throttle response and weights up the steering, yet the F-Type can’t beat the 911 on twisty roads. The Porsche is lighter and stiffer, so reacts to steering inputs faster. The steering itself is accurate and reassuringly weighted, even if it could benefit from more engagement, and the 911 rolls less through bends, too. Meanwhile, the Jag has lighter but equally accurate steering, but it provides less feedback than, say, an Audi R8.
The F-Type’s eight-speed auto transmission works well, but manual control via the steering wheel paddles isn’t as responsive. Either mode works equally well with the Porsche’s seven-speed PDK auto. Few will complain about the general ride of either model, although PASM adaptive suspension-equipped 911s are more comfortable than the F-Type despite still transmitting big bumps.
Interior
The Porsche has a beautiful interior with lovely materials throughout and an excellent driving position. Yet while the Jaguar’s cabin is more dramatic – and we love that the heating vents hum up from the dash on start-up – its materials are a step behind. Neither are its seats as impressive, while the complex menus on the touchscreen infotainment are not as intuitive as the Porsche’s. We prefer the latter’s rotary knob control, too.
From a practicality viewpoint, the F-Type is a strict two-seater, while its shallow boot has a useful underfloor secret space. The 911’s two small rear seats can be folded away to create a surprisingly usable load area. This supplements the front boot, which will accommodate a couple of squashy bags.
Running costs
The second-hand prices of same-age F-Types and 911 are very different. But while the strong resale values initially predicted for the Jag haven’t played out, that means the British sports car can be bought for a relatively bargain sum of less than £40,000 – and that’s great news for used buyers. The same sum would get you a much older, higher-mileage Porsche.
Similar running costs reflect 34.4mpg for the 911 and 32.1mpg for the F-Type. The 911’s lower emissions mean a marginally reduced annual tax bill of £270 against the F’s £295. We predict that Jaguar’s menu-priced servicing for models of three years of age or more will make maintenance costs for its two-seater coupe rather cheaper than those for the Porsche.
Both brands are below average on the What Car? Reliability Index; Jaguar rates slightly higher than Porsche.
Verdict
On its third birthday the F-Type looks as sharp as ever, and the V6 S is a great version thanks its fun drive and incredible sound. Despite its less-than-perfect gearbox, its second-hand price is the real pull, and if we had around £40,000 to spend we’d pick the Jag every time.
If we had £60k, however, an average-mileage, three-year-old 911 Carrera would win our vote. Its handling and cross-country pace outstrip the undoubtedly fun F-Type, and it also feels classier and is more practical. The same cash would buy you a nearly new F-Type, yet an older Porsche will be more satisfying over time and hold its value better. The 911 is our winner.
1st – Porsche 911 (five stars)
Among the best sports cars ever
2nd – Jaguar F-Type Coupe (four stars)
Got a lower budget? This is a great option
SPECIFICATIONS
Porsche 911 Carrera PDK
Engine: 3.4-litre petrol
List price when new: £75,897
Price today: £60,000*
Power: 345bhp
Torque: 288lb ft
0-60mph: 4.3sec
Top speed: 178mph
Economy: 34.4mpg (Official average)
CO2: 191g/km
Jaguar F-Type Coupe
Engine: 3.0-litre petrol
List price when new: £60,250
Price today: £39,000*
Power: 375bhp
Torque: 339lb ft
0-60mph: 4.7sec
Top speed: 171mph
Economy: 32.1mpg (Official average)
CO2: 209g/km
* Price today is based on a 2014 model with average mileage and full service history, correct at time of writing
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments