The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Man who cut himself off from news and outside world after Trump election win divides opinion
Hagerman's news ban has divided people
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The news of Donald Trump winning the election was the final straw for Erik Hagerman, who decided to retreat into a pig farm in Ohio to live a life of a hermit - and cut himself off totally from the news.
Hagerman, 53, a former Nike executive, was shaken badly over President Trump’s victory - so badly that he swore off news about anything happening in America after November 8 2016.
This means reading or consuming nothing at all from the outside world except the weather and sports games on mute - ignorance that has people divided.
But it was surprisingly easy to do for the former executive, who three years ago left the corporate world and moved to a secluded pig farm where he lives alone.
Requesting respect for what he calls the Blockade, Hagerman has had to ask his friends and family to purposely keep him out-of-the-loop. Some, multiple times - as they didn’t take his news ban seriously at first.
Now, more than a year into his complete news cut-off, Hagerman knows nothing, as he told The New York Times. And people have mixed opinions.
For some, the idea of shutting oneself off completely from the outside world sounds like a dream come true.
But for others, Hagerman’s conscious decision to ignore what is happening in the world around him is "offensive" and "selfish."
As implementing such a ban would require a significant amount of stability in America, and a complete lack of worries about how news could affect you, many people are criticising Hagerman’s response to Donald Trump’s election.
For writer Jamil Smith, Hagerman’s “willful ignorance” is not the answer.
Smith tweeted: “Erik Hagerman is doing exactly the wrong thing. I’m all for mental health breaks, especially with this @Potus - but willful ignorance helps no one.”
The editor of the daily newspaper in Hagerman’s Ohio town of Glouster, Tyler Buchanan, also tweeted his disapproval.
“I’m not offended when people choose not to read my newspaper. I’ve also learned to accept that people read the paper for different reasons -- some only for comics, some for the classifieds. That is totally fine,” he tweeted.
“But it does rattle me that someone CHOOSES to ignore the news. On purpose. Solely because the world around them is too harsh or the election results too unfavourable,” Buchanan wrote.
Either way, the tweets and articles criticising Hagerman likely won’t bother him - as he will never see them.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments