The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.
Gwyneth Paltrow reveals why she referred to Chris Martin split as ‘conscious uncoupling’
‘The term sounded a bit full of itself,’ recalls actor and wellness entrepreneur
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Gwyneth Paltrow has opened up about the end of her marriage to Coldplay frontman Chris Martin in a new essay.
Writing in British Vogue, the actor and Goop founder explained why she famously referred to the split as “conscious uncoupling” when she announced it in 2016.
“I had never heard of the phrase ‘conscious uncoupling’,” Paltrow recalled in the essay.
“Frankly, the term sounded a bit full of itself, painfully progressive and hard to swallow.”
The 47-year-old explained that the phrase was introduced to her through hers and Martin’s therapist, whom she refers to as ”the man who helped us architect our new future”.
Paltrow continued: “I was intrigued, less by the phrase, but by the sentiment.
“Was there a world where we could break up and not lose everything? Could we be a family, even though we were not a couple?”
Recalling the public’s reaction to her use of the phrase, she explained that it “gave way quickly to ire and derision”.
“A strange combination of mockery and anger that I had never seen,” Paltrow added.
“I was already pretty tattered from what had been a tough year. Frankly, the intensity of the response saw me bury my head in the sand deeper than I ever had in my very public life.”
As for ending her marriage with Martin, Paltrow explained that they were always close friends.
“We were close, though we had never fully settled into being a couple. We just didn’t quite fit together,” she wrote.
“There was always a bit of unease and unrest. But man, did we love our children.”
You can read the full essay on Vogue.co.uk here.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments