Breadcrumbing: The dating tactic only slightly better than ghosting
Is breadcrumbing a legitimate complaint, or do we all need to grow a thicker dating skin?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In the headache-inducing world of modern dating, a group straddles the gap between the borderline stalkers, the illusive ghosters and the tech-savvy mooners. They're called the breadcrumbers.
The term describes those people who contact you intermittently in order to keep you interested, but are stubbornly vague on whether a relationship will ever blossom. Then they vanish, and the cycle starts again. They keep you in limbo, just in case someone better comes along.
The trail of morsels that breadcrumbers leave can range from seemingly random flirtatious texts, to likes on Instagram photos from three weeks ago without making any further contact.
“The worst type of breadcrumber is the one who resurfaces every six months, and like the Loch Ness monster, you almost can’t believe this creature has come back into your life,” Alicia Winokur, a recent graduate of Mount Holyoke College, told the New York Times. “But there he is, saying, ‘Hey, I was just thinking about you’.”
But in a world where everything is instant, is crying "breadcrumb" the worst sign of entitlement? After all, texting back and forth doesn’t mean someone is bound to you.
It’s complicated, says Dr Gayle Brewer, senior lecturer in psychology at the University of Central Lancashire. Such labels can be a useful way to behaviour that we find inappropriate or hurtful, she told The Independent.
“The person on the receiving end may believe that they are at fault and unnecessarily question what they have said or done. They may also become reluctant to form romantic relationships or be less trusting.
To Dr Brewer, the whole mess could be avoided if people were clear about the type of relationship they are looking for: whether that is hooking-up or something casual while they consider their options.
“With this information, people can then decide whether to pursue the relationship and what to expect. If people are not comfortable with the agreement or if they want more than their partner can give, it might be time to end the relationship and look elsewhere.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments