Live long and die out: Stephen Jarvis encounters the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

Stephen Jarvis
Saturday 23 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (or VHEMT, pronounced Vehement) is the pressure group to end all pressure groups - literally. Organised around the slogan 'May we live long and die out', VHEMT, founded in 1991 by Les Knight, an American schoolteacher and ecological campaigner, is quite simply an organisation committed to the abolition of the human race.

In his movement's newsletter These Exit Times, Mr Knight, a resident of Portland, Oregon, provides a forum for likeminded readers sharing his desire for a world where animals can live without the threat of extinction - and where civilisation is finally silent. He says he came to this point of view in his early twenties: 'I looked at the world's problems and I traced them back to a primary source: homo sapiens. No matter how much we conserve, recycle, and eat low on the food chain, we have a huge and detrimental impact on nature.' He decided to have a vasectomy and then to embark upon his life's work: to persuade mankind to phase itself out.

Though Mr Knight is reticent about VHEMT's membership figures, he is convinced that his philosophy has a big potential following out there. He is encouraged by the letters received by These Exit Times (through which readers can also send off for VHEMT badges and 'Thank you for not breeding' bumper stickers.)

In a recent issue, one member writes: 'I've always felt more attuned to other species and somewhat uneasy about being a human.' Another claims:'As far as I'm concerned, the logic of VHEMT is airtight. A few years ago, I had a vision of mankind as a candle flame with the candle voluntarily slowly extinguishing itself and going out. I think this 'sacrifice' could be considered the greatest moral act that humanity could accomplish.'

The unconverted might see one or two problems here. There is, for example, the small matter of the basic human drive to reproduce. Mr Knight is sceptical. While he accepts the existence of sexual drive, he thinks the need for children is 'cultural conditioning', and that such desires could be channelled elsewhere: perhaps into gardening, adopting a stream, caring for old people, or by having a pet. (There is a strip cartoon in These Exit Times called Bonobo Baby: its heroine eschews motherhood, and decides to raise a bonobo, an endangered species of ape sharing 99 per cent of our genes.)

VHEMT members think that their goals can be achieved by a combination of universal contraception and will-power. 'But we know we'll never see the day ourselves when no human being lives on the planet - ours is a long-range goal.'

Mr Knight has a ready answer for questions most often asked by critics. Isn't there, for instance, something uniquely valuable and precious about the human race? 'We are certainly valuable to each other but the higher up the food chain, the less important the species.'

But if VHEMT is so concerned about preserving species, surely it should also be concerned about the preservation of man? 'It would be nice to preserve the human race, but we seem to be incompatible with the biosphere.'

What about the accomplishments of the human race? How about art and science? 'Yes, but with the human race gone, we wouldn't use them. And it bothers me more that with us around there will soon be no more large mammalian carnivores. The plays of Shakespeare and the work of Einstein can't hold a candle to a tiger.'

Mr Knight has got the answer to the billion-dollar question before you ask it. 'It has been suggested that there are only two chances of everyone volunteering to be VHEMT: slim and none. The odds may be against us, but the decision to live long and die out is still the morally correct one.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in