Letter: Why the measures were topped up
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Andrew Barr
Sir: We now know that the Government believes that it is safe for us to drink slightly more each day than it has been telling us for the last eight years, and that most doctors disapprove of the change ("Advice is out of step with medical opinion;" "We don't need one more drink," 13 December). Now we know why they dislike it. In his letter of 15 December, Professor Prichard of the Institute of Alcohol Studies - the educational arm of the United Kingdom Temperance Alliance - claims that "There is much evidence to suggest that alcohol problems in society rise in proportion to the overall level of consumption". Well, if you believe that, you probably also believe you can reduce the damage done by alcohol by persuading people to drink less on average - by keeping their consumption below a notional "safe limit". That is what doctors believe, and that is why they set the "safe limits" at such a ludicrously low level that the Government has been embarrassed by all the research about the link between moderate alcohol consumption and a reduced risk of heart disease into changing them. Yet it has never been proved that a direct link exists between the number of alcohol-related problems and the average level of alcohol consumption in any given society, nor even explained why such a link should exist.
Yours sincerely,
Andrew Barr
London, NW6
15 December
The writer is author of "Drink: an Informal History".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments