Letter: The Arts should look to themselves for salvation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TO SUGGEST that any point of view opposed to public spending and subsidy to the arts is "Philistine" aligns your newspaper with the tiny minority of people who wish to benefit personally from such funding, either as spectators or highly paid participants ("Save the Arts", Section 2, 8 February).In the same edition you run the sad story of Moseley Rugby Football Club, one of the most renowned in England, which is threatened with imminent extinction ("Tears and fears of twelve angry men", Sport). Moseley is every bit as important a part of our cultural life as an orchestra or an opera company and yet you nor anyone else would dare tosuggest public funding to bale it out.
Moseley are victims of bad management decisions and a lack of mass support from paying customers. They have paid players too much and the effect of market forces could be their demise. All we Philistines are suggesting is that similar criteria should apply to the arts which should look to themselves, their management and how much they pay themselves for the solutions to their problems and not expect the taxpaying majority to subsidise the few.
N A Hicks
Maidstone, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments