Letter: Taxed, but for what purposes?

Mark Brown
Sunday 10 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AS THE ideological chasms within the Labour Party become ever more apparent, adherents of so-called "Old Labour" - and the millions beyond their ranks who believe in a generally more radical redistribution of wealth - are derided by many commentators for a supposedly naive belief in "tax-and-spend" economics. It is time that this tautological garbage was confined to the linguistic dustbin. All governments tax and spend; it is simply a question of priorities, of who is taxed and to what purpose.

The neo-Thatcherite free-market economics of New Labour dictate that students are taxed (through tuition fees and the abolition of the maintenance grant), while the wealthy are assured that they will see no rise in their income tax for the lifetime of this parliament.

Meanwhile tax revenue is spent on the tragedy of the bombing of Iraq and the farce of the Millennium Dome, while the NHS bed shortage is blamed on a flu epidemic and the audacity of older people who choose to live longer lives without due consideration for the Treasury.

MARK BROWN

Glasgow

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in